Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lola Rae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per WP:SNOW. Clear evidence that WP:GNG is met, combined with justifiable concerns about the nominator (the creation of this discussion being their only act on Wikipedia) means that this discussion can only go one way. (non-admin closure) Exemplo347 (talk) 23:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lola Rae

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL}

Subject of article is not notable in her country as research proves, a study and google search turns up only twitter tweets and announcements from bogs which may not be independent of subject and lacks reliability this is a case of WP:TOOSOON, generally it fails WP:GNG. it should be Deleted very fastly. Angeladore (talk) 15:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article passes WP:RS, WP:GNG and is notable in her country as they're publications on popular and reputable news websites, google search turns out a lot on GNEWS, in fact all statements by nominator says otherwise to what i found, nominator may be having WP:COI or issues leading to nomination. Zazzysa (talk) 22:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep subject meets WP:GNG per these sources from Vanguard, Daily Post, Vanguard, The Punch and Premium Times. She was extensively discussed by Pulse NG. By the way, this edit shows @Angeladore: (who I think might have issues with the subject) created this afd thread while this edit shows contrary. Sockpuppetry? —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 23:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:35, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
strong keep article passes WP:ANYBIO, WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG, my thesis is this; nominator of article clearly is doing this to undermine @Oluwa2Chainz: as an editor (personal reasons obviously) as history shows this user @Angeladore: only created a page for this sole purpose. Admin should speedily keep this and let's focus on real things affecting Wikipedia and its editors. Celestina007 (talk) 12:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The subject of this article passes WP:GNG. In addition to the sources pointed out by Oluwa2Chainz, I was able to find coverage in The Guardian Nigeria and BBC UK. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 21:54, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.